THIS IS NOT AN ACTUAL PAGE THAT GETS DISPLAYED. HOWEVER, YOU MUST EDIT THIS TABLE HERE IN ORDER FOR IT TO APPEAR ON THE COMPLIANCE CONCERNS PAGE for 2018-2019.
Case Number | Agency/Provider | Supervising Entity | Case Summary |
---|---|---|---|
2018-3052 | Fremont County Department of Human Services | Colorado Department of Human Services | The CPO’s review of the case found the Fremont County Department of Human Services may not be in compliance with screening and assessment requirements outlined in state rule. |
2018-3123 | Washington County Department of Human Services | Colorado Department of Human Services | The CPO’s review of the case found the Washington County Department of Human Services may not be in compliance with notification requirements outlined in state rule. |
2018-3281 | Otero County Department of Human Services | Colorado Department of Human Services | The CPO’s review of the case found the Otero County Department of Human Services may not be in compliance with monthly contact and documentation requirements outlined in state rule. |
2018-3401 | Division of Youth Services | Colorado Department of Human Services | The CPO’s review of the case found that the staff at the DYS facility may have violated facility policies when they denied the youth visits and when the youth was prohibited from making phone calls. |
2019-3700 | Douglas County Department of Human Services | Colorado Department of Human Services | The CPO’s review of the case found the Douglas County Department of Human Services may not be in compliance with monthly contact, family services plan and documentation requirements outlined in state rule. |
2019-3689 | Adams County Human Services Department | Colorado Department of Human Services | The CPO’s review of the case found the Adams County Human Services Department may not be in compliance with educational stability requirements outlined in state rule. |
2019-3672 | Conejos County Department of Social Services | Colorado Department of Human Services | The CPO’s review of the case found the Conejos County Department of Social Services may not be in compliance with contact requirements outlined in state rule. |
2019-3665 | Rio Grande County Department of Social Services | Colorado Department of Human Services | The CPO’s review of the case found the Rio Grande Department of Social Services may not be in compliance with assigned response time, contact, and documentation requirements outlined in state rule. |
2019-3774 | Alamosa County Department of Human Services | Colorado Department of Human Services | The CPO’s review of the case found the Alamosa County Department of Human Services may not be in compliance with assessment guidelines outline in state rule. |
2019-3622 | Morgan County Department of Human Services | Colorado Department of Human Services | The CPO’s review of the case found the Morgan County Department of Human Services may not be in compliance with assessment guidelines outline in state rule. |
2019-3663 | Montezuma County Department of Social Services | Colorado Department of Human Services | The CPO’s review of the case found the Montezuma County Department of Social Services may not be in compliance with assessment requirements contained in state rule. |
2019-3733 | Crowley County Department of Human Services | Colorado Department of Human Services | The CPO’s review of the case found the Crowley County Department of Human Services may not be in compliance with screening and confidentiality requirements contained in state rule. The CDHS partially agreed with the CPO’s findings. |
2019-3738 | Arapahoe County Department of Human Services | Colorado Department of Human Services | The CPO’s review of the case found the Arapahoe County Department of Human Services may not be in compliance with the monthly contact and engagement guidelines outlined in state rule. The CDHS agreed with the CPO’s findings. |
2019-3741 | Arapahoe County Department of Human Services | Colorado Department of Human Services | The CPO’s review of the case found the Arapahoe County Department of Human Services may not be in compliance with the screening, parental engagement, monthly contact and family service plan guidelines outlined in state rule. The CDHS agreed with the CPO’s findings. |