THIS IS NOT AN ACTUAL PAGE THAT GETS DISPLAYED. HOWEVER, YOU MUST EDIT THIS TABLE HERE IN ORDER FOR IT TO APPEAR ON THE COMPLIANCE CONCERNS PAGE for 2018-2019.

Case Number Agency/Provider Supervising Entity Case Summary
2018-3052 Fremont County Department of Human Services Colorado Department of Human Services The CPO’s review of the case found the Fremont County Department of Human Services may not be in compliance with screening and assessment requirements outlined in state rule.
2018-3123 Washington County Department of Human Services Colorado Department of Human Services The CPO’s review of the case found the Washington County Department of Human Services may not be in compliance with notification requirements outlined in state rule.
2018-3281 Otero County Department of Human Services Colorado Department of Human Services The CPO’s review of the case found the Otero County Department of Human Services may not be in compliance with monthly contact and documentation requirements outlined in state rule.
2018-3401 Division of Youth Services Colorado Department of Human Services The CPO’s review of the case found that the staff at the DYS facility may have violated facility policies when they denied the youth visits and when the youth was prohibited from making phone calls.
2019-3700 Douglas County Department of Human Services Colorado Department of Human Services The CPO’s review of the case found the Douglas County Department of Human Services may not be in compliance with monthly contact, family services plan and documentation requirements outlined in state rule.
2019-3689 Adams County Human Services Department Colorado Department of Human Services The CPO’s review of the case found the Adams County Human Services Department may not be in compliance with educational stability requirements outlined in state rule.
2019-3672 Conejos County Department of Social Services Colorado Department of Human Services The CPO’s review of the case found the Conejos County Department of Social Services may not be in compliance with contact requirements outlined in state rule.
2019-3665 Rio Grande County Department of Social Services Colorado Department of Human Services The CPO’s review of the case found the Rio Grande Department of Social Services may not be in compliance with assigned response time, contact, and documentation requirements outlined in state rule.
2019-3774 Alamosa County Department of Human Services Colorado Department of Human Services The CPO’s review of the case found the Alamosa County Department of Human Services may not be in compliance with assessment guidelines outline in state rule.
2019-3622 Morgan County Department of Human Services Colorado Department of Human Services The CPO’s review of the case found the Morgan County Department of Human Services may not be in compliance with assessment guidelines outline in state rule.
2019-3663 Montezuma County Department of Social Services Colorado Department of Human Services The CPO’s review of the case found the Montezuma County Department of Social Services may not be in compliance with assessment requirements contained in state rule.
2019-3733 Crowley County Department of Human Services Colorado Department of Human Services The CPO’s review of the case found the Crowley County Department of Human Services may not be in compliance with screening and confidentiality requirements contained in state rule. The CDHS partially agreed with the CPO’s findings.
2019-3738 Arapahoe County Department of Human Services Colorado Department of Human Services The CPO’s review of the case found the Arapahoe County Department of Human Services may not be in compliance with the monthly contact and engagement guidelines outlined in state rule. The CDHS agreed with the CPO’s findings.
2019-3741 Arapahoe County Department of Human Services Colorado Department of Human Services The CPO’s review of the case found the Arapahoe County Department of Human Services may not be in compliance with the screening, parental engagement, monthly contact and family service plan guidelines outlined in state rule. The CDHS agreed with the CPO’s findings.